Doug doesn’t have much faith in the legion of attorneys retained by the country’s largest banks. Mr. Cassity has filed a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum that argues only he can effectively cross examine witnesses to NPS’ compliance with the 1994 consent judgment. Mr. Cassity argues that NPS could legally withdraw from trust all funds in excess of the market value of the insurance policies purchased by the trust. This ‘legal argument’ is not actually based on R.S.MO. Section 436.031, but rather on statements attributed to the Missouri Attorney General’s office and its representatives. Mr. Cassity’s argument also asserts that life insurance, whether it term life or whole life, can be valued at its face.
This is a man who still believes his own hype.