Big dreams buried by big questions: NPS

Yesterday, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch ran an article that examined the history of NPS, and raised some of the questions that need to be explored in depth in the months to come.   The system failed in several states, for both consumers and funeral homes.   While most funeral homes will try to make good on the NPS promises to consumers, regulators must share in the responsibilities for what went wrong and what has to be done.

NPS was an innovative company that grew frustrated with the fragmented nature of state preneed laws, and exploited the gaps and ambiguities of state regulation.   Some will say that NPS exploited the greed of funeral directors, and this should be sufficient reason for holding funeral homes responsible for performance of the NPS contracts. While this will ring true for some funeral directors, this is too simplistic an explanation of the situation.   The reality is that many funeral homes will fail if regulators do not recover sufficient assets from the Cassitys. 

Does anyone have the name of a good lawyer?

A few months ago I stumbled across the FuneralAdvice.com website when searching the net for some information on embalming. Google found a post on the site that was somewhat helpful, but did not provide the answer I was looking for. I bookmarked the site, and by coincidence, visited the site again today.

The site’s current post asks what can be done when Grandma’s preneed contract is refused by the new owners of the local funeral home? The site acknowledges this situation is becoming more common, and recommends that the poster contact the state board of funeral directors for suggestions. The response concludes with the following advice:

A good lawyer should be able to quickly and effectively remedy the situation.

If this post is genuine and the site sponsors have extensive experience with the death care industry (as they claim), then I must not be a good lawyer. I have resolved many disputes such as this with a letter threatening litigation. In almost all situations, the new “owners” eventually agreed to honor the contract. However, I do not consider this type of remedy to be either quick or effective for the family. The value of the ritual has been permanently scarred by the experience. 

The About page for FuneralAdvice.com explains the site was born out of the need to find non-biased information relating to the funeral industry. The page also advises that the company that manages the website has extensive experience in the funeral industry through the ownership of other websites related to the industry. If one takes the time to track through the provided hyperlinks to the related websites, additional information can be found about the company’s officers. When I read through their bios, I can’t help but think of that line from the hotel commercial:

            No, I am not a funeral director, but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

There is a need for Internet websites that provide objective information relating to the funeral industry. While FuneralAdvice.com does provide some useful information, the site goes too far in holding itself out as “Funeral Advice You Can Trust”.   The format also seems to be misleading, and I sense that FuneralAdvice.com is just seeking to establish traffic for the web services offered to the funeral industry.      

Accountability and the Master Trust

A bank client recently asked that I provide some standard of accountability for administration provided to a master preneed trust. As I struggle to provide the client a concise answer, I can’t help but to think that the issue will also become a crucial concern to consumers and funeral directors alike. As news reports reach consumers about the regulatory actions taken against the preneed programs maintained by NPS and by the Illinois Funeral Directors Association, families will begin to contact their funeral directors for reassurances about their preneed payments. Unfortunately, many state associations have not made accountability a priority, and their members may be ill prepared to respond to consumers’ concerns. 

For the independent funeral home, the state association can be a valuable resource to understanding the requirements imposed upon the profession by federal and state laws. As the preneed transaction grew in acceptance, most state associations formed master trusts to serve their member funeral homes.   These master trusts came to reflect not only the respective state’s preneed law, but also the attitudes and values of the association leadership.

Consumers need to appreciate that master preneed trusts are an important source of income to the sponsoring association. Because there are costs to providing contracts, administration, compliance, and asset management, the master trust provides the smaller funeral home the economies of scale necessary to reducing costs that would otherwise be prohibitive. However, the Illinois situation suggests that former association leadership may have exploited both members and consumers. While the association’s website is finally acknowledging the issue, the response lacks in terms of accountability. 

Getting back to my client’s question, how should accountability be measured for preneed administration from state to state? The diversity in the approaches taken by the state legislatures in regulating the preneed transaction is the single greatest hurdle to a comprehensive, national evaluation of preneed accountability. But perhaps transparency in terms of disclosures to both members and consumers would be one measure of accountability. On this standard, I would give kudos to the New Jersey Funeral Directors Association. It may be a sad reflection on the industry, but many funeral directors do not know what they are being charged for preneed services. The NJFDA provides this information for all to see.

If consumers do call for reassurances, funeral directors should have some basic information available to provide:

  • How the preneed contract is funded (insurance vs. trust).
  • The name of the insurance company or trustee.
  • If the contract is trust funded, whether the trust holds deposit accounts, investments dictated by statute, diversified investments or insurance.
  • Contact information for the person who can provide more information about the account.

When funeral directors begin to call for reassurances, association leadership should be prepared to provide the following information:

  • The name and address of the trustee.
  • The costs and expenses of the master trust.
  • The master trust’s written investment policy.
  • The fees paid to the trustee and account administrator.
  • The taxes paid by the trust.
  • A summary report of the trust’s performance and asset description.
  • A disclosure of related party transactions (loans, discounts, service agreements, etc.)
  • A summary of all trust expenses (excluding distributions for preneed contract performances and cancellations).
  • The sponsorship fee paid the association. 

The Fork in the Road: personalization vs religious rituals

Two recent newspaper articles help to underscore the distinct directions the funeral ritual seems headed. 

The Kansas City Star reported on how more families are opting for personalization over formal funeral rituals.  As the article indicates, personalization often requires the funeral director to spend more time with the family planning a memorial that is unique to the deceased.  This approach also challenges the preneed approach of selling a package arrangement that covers 'everything'. 

Personalization represents a departure from the Christian liturgy that allowed a standardized approach to funeral planning.  While some theologians criticize the funeral industry's departure from the traditional (religious) funeral ritual, others have come to realize how clergy often overlook the emotional needs of the surviving family members.  The Calvin Institute of Christian Worship devotes several pages from its website to the "funerals that minister to those left behind".  

As more clergy become more sensitive to the psychological needs of the surviving family members, funeral directors may have an opportunity to work more closely with churches seeking to provide a more spiritual ritual for their congregations.  The latter approach was underscored by an article about funeral directors seeking to serve the needs of immigrants.

A General Price List nightmare?

The Scarborough Council just announced increases in their funeral, cremation and burial prices. There are going to be nearly 80 different levels of charging Some of the charges depend on whether they involve cremation, burial, the times when funerals take place, the use of the service chapel and scattering the remains and whether the remains are those of a child or adult. Interment prices will depend on whether the rights are for 100 years, or less, and the depth of the grave.

Makes one wonder if the Brits have a GPL requirement?

Section 685 - Removing the Cap

The National Funeral Directors Association has taken the lead in getting legislation introduced to eliminate the dollar cap imposed on qualified funeral trusts.  While I hope the NFDA succeeds, it won't be without a fight from the IRS. 

As the death care industry inches towards the non-guaranteed preneed transaction, the IRS will express its concerns over abusive trusts.  While funeral directors ponder whether consumers will embrace a preneed transaction that does not provide price guarantees, the IRS will question whether the transaction will be abused as a tax shelter. 

The Section 685 needs to be increased substantially, but I anticipate the Service will pull no punches while fighting the NFDA's efforts.