Consumers and funeral directors are asking their state regulators how they let the National Prearranged Services collapse to happen. With the exception of Missouri and Iowa, the NPS preneed contract was generally an insurance-funded transaction, and state insurance regulators are taking most of the heat. It is a very different story in Missouri, as witnessed
chapter 436
Lost in the translation: Missouri’s preneed exemption of cemeteries
By Bill Stalter on
The Missouri Legislature has reform of Chapter 436, the preneed funeral law, on the fast track. With the speed that Senate Bill 1 has been amended and perfected, it may be more appropriate to label this reform as being in the express lane. However, Missouri legislators must not lose track of the cemetery industry’s efforts…
Déjà vu: Missouri’s Latest Reform Effort
By Bill Stalter on
The Missouri Senate Committee assigned the task of preneed funeral reform posted a substitute bill to the Legislature’s website on February 6th: SCS SB1. For those who participated in the Chapter 436 Working Group meetings last summer, this bill may seem vaguely familiar. During those meetings, the Division of Professional Registration circulated a 41-page…
Mark-to-Market and Preneed: a bitter, but necessary, pill?
By Bill Stalter on
Posted in Legislation, Preneed
For twenty-two years many Missouri funeral directors have deposited 80% of the preneed funeral contract purchase price into trust, and withdrawn all income in excess of that deposit. For a $5,000 contract sold in 1998, the funeral director has been required to maintain $4,000 in trust. When that contract is performed in 2008, the funeral…
Chapter 436 Recommendations: First the trust, then…
By Bill Stalter on
Why did you agree to that?
That’s the question I have been getting to the Chapter 436 Working Group recommendations regarding i) the deposit of all purchaser payments to trust, and ii) some form of periodic statement to the consumer. One answer would be that we see too many news reports like this…
Missouri Preneed Reform: work in progress
By Bill Stalter on
While the completion of the document may have felt like a birthing process to the staff of Missouri’s Division of Professional Registration, the Chapter 436 Working Group Recommendations more accurately reflects an industry position paper that has yet to be completed. Faced with a deadline imposed by the Missouri legislature, the Division ‘finalized’ the Recommendations in an…
A choice
By Bill Stalter on
It is encouraging when funeral directors and consumer advocates engage in meaningful debate about the future of Missouri’s preneed industry. And, there seems to be some consensus that the non-guaranteed contract should have a greater presence in the state.
In the third of six scheduled meetings, industry and consumers were faced with those prickly issues of the trusting…
Preneed Portability: easier said than done
By Bill Stalter on
So why is it so tough to provide preneed portability? Because the transaction has been defined by state law as a contract between a consumer and a death care company, and federal regulators tend to agree. When the issue has arisen in the context of federal preemption, the interests of the state regulator have prevailed…
The Costs of Death
By Bill Stalter on
Posted in Preneed
A year ago, the Dayton JournalNews ran a series of articles about the regulation of the death care industry in Ohio. The reporting was comprehensive, with articles about preneed. Earlier this year, legislation was introduced in Ohio to further restrict who could sell preneed. However, the legislation does not address the trusting issues that rankle consumer advocates. …
Missouri Preneed Reform: Act 2
By Bill Stalter on
As news of the NPS meltdown began to leak last month, several proposals to reform Missouri’s preneed law were hastily drafted. Not knowing the extent of NPS’ problems, some reform advocates felt the need to strike while the iron was hot.
Even as the legislative session ended on May 16th, it was not clear whether…